|
LESOTHO’S POTENTIAL FOR EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION
There is need to
lessen the extent to which the economy is currently
dependent upon preferential market access for the export of
clothing ….
Background
Lesotho is
disadvantaged by its geographical location. It is one of the
land-locked poor countries. Lesotho’s economy is dependant
on a narrow flow of exports of clothing largely destined to
one country-the United States of America (US). At the end of
2005 exports to the US accounted for nearly 60 per cent of
the total exports. The issue of narrow product flow and
market is paramount to Lesotho because of three reasons
namely; the indication of preferential tariffs being eroded,
the Multi Fibre Agreement (MFA) quota system has come to an
end in 31 December 2004, allowing for ascension of more
competitive countries, like China, into the World Trade
Organization. The derogation from the Africa Growth and
Opportunities Act (AGOA) rules of origin (ROO) which will
come to an end at the end of 2007, presents a challenge on
sourcing of inputs.
Lesotho’s
economy has been experiencing periods of high growth , but
the benefits have not been translated into better lives for
many Basotho, as indicated by a high level of unemployment..
Inflation remains subdued and this augurs well for the
economy. In the period 1980s to late 1990s, economic growth
benefited from capital injection attributed to the Lesotho
Highlands Water Project (LHWP). Since 2001 the economy has
relied on the exponential growth of exports in the clothing
sector as a result of the introduction of AGOA. We
subsequently explore why this dependency is a challenge.
Lesotho’s Export Structure
Lesotho
faces a problem of heavy reliance on clothing and garment
exports destined to mainly one market, the US. Access to
this market is dependent on rules as embodied in AGOA.
Therefore the dependency of the economy on one market will
last as long as such concessions are in place. This implies
directly that if the tariffs are eroded, Lesotho will be
unable to trade above the 17.9 percent tariff that it would
have to face in the absence of preferences. It should,
however, be cautioned that the volume of exports in clothing
also include a pool that goes to the South African market.
Using data from 2002, it is indicative that eleven of the
top 20 trade lines at the (Harmonized System) HS 6 level are
related to clothing of exports. It should be noted that the
share of the US and South Africa does not account for all of
Lesotho’s external trade. It is also noted that footwear,
water, bricks, TV components and milling products, which
constitute nine lines are destined for the South African
market only. This implies denim material and products
constitute a major line with a market outside South Africa.
Data for 2004 indicates that there was some penetration of
the Canadian and Botswana Markets.
Export
Diversification
At this level
an attempt is made to underscore the importance of the South
African and US markets. It is observed that three products
seem to top the list namely; footwear, TV and Electronics
and water. There is however need to understand these issues
by reading the finer prints. Water is a potential industry
if it can graduate from the current level of channel
transfer to South Africa to include the water bottling
industry; accompanied by massive marketing strategy. The TV
and Electronics is an established industry but has a
potential to grow only if new products are introduced.
Footwear depicts a mixed picture. There is no established
direction of growth. The cereal industry has a potential, as
Lesotho imports almost all of its food consumption. The
potential is also realised on furniture manufacturing,
pharmaceutical products and diamond industry. In addition
bricks and sand stone and ceramics are deemed capable of
being exported. It is therefore noted that Lesotho has a
potential to diversify to the latter category of products,
if policy effort is directed at enhancing their productivity
and competitiveness.
Learning
from Global Stars
It is
highly considered that the Lesotho export structure can
learn from export products that are dominating international
markets. This helps in-as-far as it gives guidelines on
which products have demand and who dominates in that market.
It is noted that for the period 1985 to 2000, three sectors
appeared to be dominating the international product market;
automobiles and parts, clothing and electronics. Lesotho is
highly involved in clothing whose growth in the global
market exceeded world average, indicating encouraging
prospects. Lesotho also features in the electronics
category, though on a small scale. And Lesotho does no
feature in automobile and parts production. The top 40 star
product lines include medicaments, furniture and diamonds.
Therefore, this highlights the extent to which Lesotho can
harvest, if properly repositioned.
It is
realized that the need for such growth to take place, there
is a mammoth task to look into promotion and marketing of
such products. The Government of Lesotho will, among others
need to awaken the apathy that is observed in the private
sector, in particular emphasis should be on repositioning of
the local business community to enhance its understanding of
the economy and be able to act as a catalyst for growth.
Productivity and Labor Costs
The
ability of a country to have presence in the international
product market is influenced by the country’s
competitiveness. The two categories that are of importance
to Lesotho are labor productivity and labor costs. The
former is found to be generally low in Lesotho, especially
if compared to other low cost producers like China, Sri
Lanka and India. There is however a note that productivity
has a potential of increasing if training activities for
workers are intensified.
It is
clear that labor costs in Lesotho are low compared to its
peers in the same export categories. Labour in Lesotho is
of a high educational level, and this makes it easer to
retrain them into newer skills. It is therefore envisioned
that the balance between productivity and labor costs
determines production and export mix of a country. It should
be noted that the weave of labour cost, productivity and
infrastructure is integral to policy planning.
Lesotho’s Peculiarity
The
issue of whether Lesotho is in a peculiar situation becomes
necessary when we seek to understand whether Lesotho is the
only country facing challenges surrounding the Textile and
Apparel imports from Africa into US. Preliminary commerce
data from the US Department of Commerce shows that textile
and apparel imports from Africa are on a declining trend.
The rate of decline has grown from 8.35 percent during
January to June 2005, to -11.74 percent in January to July,
to -13.01 percent in January to August 2005. The overall
rate for the year is an average of -16.40 percent.
The 2005
trend has demonstrated in greater detail that Africa is the
only region in the world which has experienced a greater
decline in apparel exports to the US. The scenario is
depicted by the insert table below;
|
US
Textile and Apparel Imports from Africa |
|
Country |
Jan-Dec 2004 |
Jan-Dec 2005 |
%
Change |
|
Botswana |
5.835 |
7.836 |
34.24 |
|
Cape
Verde |
1.146 |
0.914 |
-20.24 |
|
Ghana |
9.331 |
6.515 |
-30.18 |
|
Kenya |
73.396 |
73.225 |
-0.23 |
|
Lesotho |
111.128 |
93.458 |
-15.90 |
|
Madagascar |
69.414 |
62.281 |
-10.28 |
|
Mauritius |
37.406 |
28.932 |
-22.65 |
|
South Africa |
57.362 |
28.445 |
-50.41 |
|
Swaziland |
61.469 |
54.638 |
-11.11 |
|
Tanzania |
1.541 |
1.616 |
4.87 |
|
Sub-Sahara |
462.100 |
386.333 |
-16.40 |
It is
therefore worrying that Africa’s export in this category is
declining while exports from else where are increasing.
Possibilities for Product Diversification
The
understanding should be that the current production should
still go on, though the challenges have to be noted as real
and having a potential to derail economic growth. There is a
need to seek new markets and expand them (this can be
European Union, Australia and Canada among others). It is
important to entrench broader penetration into the US market
through buyer and distribution networks; thus broadening the
narrow product base by looking at a bigger pool of products
in the US and SACU where preferential tariffs exist.
There is
also hope that this can be achieved as Government policy in
Lesotho is geared towards private sector development, with
the assistance of the World Bank. The sectors that are
likely to be explored are those supported by trade data;
horticulture, garments industry, and tourism.
The paper benefited from Lesotho: Potential Export
Diversification Study
Table 1: Monetary and Financial
Indicators
+
|
|
Oct. |
Nov. |
Dec. |
|
1. Interest
rates (Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime
Lending rate |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
1.2 Prime
Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings
Deposit Rate |
1.24 |
1.24 |
1.24 |
|
1.4 Interest
rate Margin( 1.1 – 1.3) |
10.26 |
10.26 |
10.26 |
|
1.5 Treasury
Bill Yield (91-day) |
6.74 |
6.60 |
6.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary
Indicators (Million Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad
Money (M2) |
2519.7 |
2593.5 |
2590.0 |
|
2.2 Net
Claims on Government by the Banking System |
-1209.13 |
-1103.20 |
-910.08 |
|
2.3 Net
Foreign Assets – Banking System |
4683.29 |
4580.33 |
4211.18 |
|
2.4 CBL Net
Foreign Assets |
3436.3 |
3200.22 |
3076.22 |
|
2.5 Domestic
Credit |
-481.56 |
-365.57 |
7.16 |
|
2.6 Reserve
Money |
425.36 |
392.09 |
545.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$
Exchange Rate (monthly average) |
6.5895 |
6.6561 |
6.3691 |
|
4. Inflation
(year-on-year percentage change) |
3.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
5. External
Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
QI
|
QII
|
QIII
|
|
5.1 Current
Account Balance (Excl. LHWP) |
52.86 |
-122.41 |
34.71 |
|
5.2 Capital
and Financial Account Balance (Excl. LHWP) |
-69.05 |
187.88 |
-102.54 |
|
5.3 Reserves
Assets |
-119.83 |
-94.55 |
26.53 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2: Selected Economic
Indicators
|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005* |
|
1. Output
Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross
Domestic Product – GDP |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
1.2 |
|
1.2 Gross
Domestic Product Excluding LHWP |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
1.1 |
|
1.3 Gross
National Product – GNI |
1.6 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
0.3 |
|
1.4 Per capita
–GNI |
-0.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
-0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral
Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
Agriculture |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
|
2.2
Manufacturing |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
-8.3 |
|
2.3
Construction |
6.9 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
2.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
3.9 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |