|
BUDGET SPEECH FOR
2004/2005 FISCAL YEAR
Free
Primary Education enters its fifth year, but there is a looming
question over its sustainability beyond class seven due to the high
cost. For the first time in seven years, a surplus is forecasted for
the year 2004/2005 on expectation of SACU revenue windfall...
Introduction
The
budget speech time always transmits an exciting tremor in almost
every economy. It is normally centred around the government’s
self-performance appraisal on execution of the past year’s economic
policies, outstanding challenges and the way forward. Consistent
success in fulfilment of promises made in the budget of previous
years could raise confidence in a government’s ability to implement
its fiscal policies. This feat could serve as an important drawcard
of grants and foreign investments as it marks the government’s
commitment to the country’s development. Most importantly, under the
way forward, the government presents a package of public expenditure
plans and tax legislation for the following fiscal year. This is an
important, transparent, enlightening and informative event as the
public gets to be acquainted with the government of the day’s
objectives and aspirations. The public at large, residents and
non-residents, are then able to anticipate the likely impact of
government behaviour in the short to medium horizon. The information
enables them to make necessary adjustments to benefit from the
impact of positive policy decisions or cushion the adverse impact.
Budget for 2003/2004 and
Outturn
During the fiscal year ending in March 2004, the
Government of Lesotho (GOL) projected an overall deficit of 2.9% of
Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As can be observed from table 1 below,
this projection is a 2.4% reduction from the initial deficit
approved by Parliament. The present positive outlook is a far cry
from the fiscal year 2002/2003, when the actual overall balance
turned out to be sizeably higher than that approved by Parliament.
This was mostly due to unforeseen food insecurity in the country.
The expected improvement in 2003/2004 stems mostly from a combined
effect of additional revenue raising measures and expenditure
containment strategies.
From an approved estimate of 40.1% as a share of
GDP, the revenue collection for 2003/2004 is expected to improve to
42.6%. The expected improvement emanates mainly from tax revenue in
the areas of income tax at 9.9% from initial 8.7%, Value Added Tax
(VAT) at 5.9% from 4.5% and Customs at a slightly improved 16.6%
from 16.3%. The increase in these areas highlights the commendable
contribution that the operationalisation of Lesotho Revenue
Authority (LRA) has had as far as revenue collection is concerned.
With regards to expenditure containment
strategies employed on the discretionary services, total approved
expenditure is expected to fall from 46.1% as a proportion of GDP to
45.5%. Most of the fall in total expenditure is expected to emanate
from capital expenditure component. It is expected to decline from
9.9% of GDP to 8.7% while recurrent component is expected to
increase marginally to 37.0% from 36.4% of GDP. Since Lesotho is a
developing economy, capital expenditure should have been given
first priority over some recurrent expenditure in spending decisions
as and when funds do allow. However, if the fall in this form of
expenditure signals under-spending due to slower than expected
implementation of capital projects, then the GOL should improve
capacity in this area.
The
immense challenges for GOL in 2003/2004 remained mostly in the areas
of food security, HIV/AIDS, empowering the private sector to
spearhead the much needed economic growth, proper financial
management as well as efficient and effective service provision. In
order to ensure that economic growth trickles down to the poor, a
proper government structure has to be in place. The design of
government to achieve efficiency is very important but a complex
process of weighing up the costs and benefits of alternative
organisational structures. There is an ongoing dialogue on
decentralisation, whose main benefits are that smaller local
government structures make decision on behalf of consumers.
The Way Forward -
Budget Proposal for 2004/2005
Table
1. Government Budgetary Operations (Million Maloti; % of GDP)
|
Budget Item
|
2002/2003 Budget
Outturn |
Approved 2003/2004 Budget |
Projected Outturn for 2003/2004 |
Proposed 2004/2005 Budget |
|
|
Amt. |
% |
Amt. |
% |
Amt. |
% |
Amt. |
% |
|
Revenue and Grants |
3331.0 |
45.2 |
3496.1 |
40.8 |
3644.9 |
42.6 |
4569.6 |
48.4 |
|
Revenue |
3034.7 |
40.1 |
3203.6 |
37.4 |
3368.1 |
39.4 |
4232.8 |
44.9 |
|
Grants |
296.3 |
5.1 |
292.5 |
3.4 |
276.8 |
3.2 |
336.8 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditure and Net Lending |
3532.9 |
45.8 |
3946.5 |
46.1 |
3892.3 |
45.5 |
4318.9 |
45.8 |
|
Recurrent Expenditure |
2876.2 |
35.4 |
3117.3 |
35.8 |
3165.1 |
37.0 |
3494.0 |
37.0 |
|
Capital Expenditure |
779.9 |
10.4 |
846.2 |
9.9 |
740.9 |
8.7 |
842.7 |
8.9 |
|
Net Lending |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-17.0 |
-0.2 |
-13.7 |
-0.2 |
-17.8 |
-0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus/Deficit after Grants |
-325.1 |
-0.6 |
-450.4 |
-5.3 |
-247.4 |
-2.9 |
250.7 |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
325.1 |
0.6 |
450.4 |
5.3 |
247.4 |
2.9 |
-250.7 |
-2.7 |
|
Foreign Financing |
53.4 |
1.0 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
-25.9 |
-0.3 |
-41.9 |
-0.4 |
|
Domestic Financing |
271.7 |
-0.4 |
450.6 |
5.3 |
273.3 |
3.2 |
-208.8 |
-2.2 |
Source: 2003/2004 Budget Speech of the Minister of Finance and
Development Planning
Implications of the
2004/2005 Budget
On the plus side, the present budget projects
real economic growth of 3.6%, which is slightly higher than the
growth of 3.4% in 2003. Economic growth is important as it
contributes to reduction of income poverty, and could serve as an
attraction to foreign capital. Due to its balanced(surplus) nature
this fiscal year, it would ensure that the debt burden is reduced as
well as future interest payments. In addition, the inflationary
pressures associated with high government spending should be
expected to subside. With regards to FPE, the strategy will further
lessen the burden of poverty by allowing households to spend more on
health, nutrition and other necessities of life, while it raises
chances for better lives in the future as literacy levels improve.
Apart from provision of education, FPE provides nutrition and
relevant pastime for poor children and orphans, especially HIV/AIDS
orphans. FPE also provides income employment opportunities for more
teachers, people building more schools and those cooking for the
kids.
The employment creation through public works,
would be beneficial, especially for the rural communities who are
underemployed in subsistence agriculture, returning migrant miners
and former construction workers in LHWP. The improvement of several
roads to bitumen standard would continue to open unexplored parts of
the country to such opportunities as tourism. The development of
Tikoe industrial estate would ensure the industries continue to
absorb more workers. The anticipated introduction of IDs in place of
passports is a welcome solution of identification for the nation.
This would go a long way in inducing some growth in private sector
credit extension by financial institutions by providing reliable
identification for prospective borrowers. The foundation being laid
for decentralisation, would help to improve efficient delivery of
services to the people. The increase in civil servants salaries
should also incentivise them to further improve services delivery.
The sizeable reduction of other goods and services, reflects GOL’s
intentions to reduce spending and to improve public financial
management.
On the shortcomings side, the proposed budget
does not target specific quantitative goals such as a certain level
of employment or price stability. In addition, the budget recognises
the need for Public Private Partnerships and that they would be
achieved in the medium to long-term, but there is no clear strategy
for the private sector to engineer the much needed economic growth
in the interim. This refers in part to the empowerment of the Small
and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Although FPE is beneficial as
described above, its long-term sustainability is in question, the
fact that the budget speech also admits. From the onset, the
financing question has always lingered and the opportunity cost of
financing this project is seemingly going to heavily fall on other
areas, including other skills development. Economic services, which
comprise the ministries of Agriculture and Food Security, Trade,
Industry, Co-operatives and Marketing, Tourism, Environment and
Culture, Communications, Science and Technology and Public Works and
Transport, have been awarded 18% of the budget and seem to be some
of those sectors that are beginning to loose out to FPE. These
services could contribute a lot in the economy if enough funding is
allocated to them. Another grey area of the budget is that it does
not specify how the important complementary role of monetary policy
would be utilised to arrive at broader economic targets. Lastly, the
budget continues to be consumption driven with recurrent expenditure
accounting for about 81% (an increase of 2%) of the budget and the
remaining 19% (decreased by 2%) only available for capital
expenditure. The declining and low levels of capital investment
might adversely affect the long-term sustainability of income and
employment over the years.
Conclusion and
Recommendations
An important principle of budget, whether in
public or private sector is to set specific quantitative goals.
Having set these targets, then fiscal and monetary policies should
be geared towards them. The improvement in revenue collection
arising from the inception of LRA should be commended. However, this
improvement should be seen to trickle down to the people at the
grassroots through appropriate government structures. A budget
surplus should also be applauded, thanks to SACU revenue. It should
be noted that the long-term sustainability of SACU revenue is in
question. Therefore it is important for LRA to be afforded with all
necessary resources to improve on its revenue collections in
anticipation of the aforementioned. Although it is important to
maintain expenditure rationalisation measures in order to accumulate
foreign reserves and government savings, non-implementation of the
capital projects is not the best of solutions. To address this,
capacity has to be built in the project management related areas. On
the other hand, government should work hard to contain recurrent
budget on a sustainable level.
Table 2. Monetary and
Financial Indicators+
|
|
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
12.50 |
12.50 |
12.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
12.00 |
11.5 |
11.5 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
2.00 |
2.41 |
2.31 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 – 1.3) |
2.00 |
10.09 |
10.19 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield (91-day) |
10.57 |
9.21 |
9.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2) |
2297.9 |
2217.9 |
2279.1 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by the Banking System |
-167.0 |
-386.4 |
-371.9 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets – Banking System |
3460.7 |
3699.4 |
3845.7 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
2853.0 |
3188.1 |
3055.92 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
380.6 |
171.6 |
30.1 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
364.9 |
333.6 |
325.50 |
|
|
| |