|
LESOTHO'S BUDGET SPEECH FOR THE 2005/06
FISCAL YEAR: PROGRESS, PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES FOR THE
ECONOMY
Background
In development economics, economic growth is
not the only indicator of a nation’s development.
Development is deemed as a multidimensional process
involving major changes in social structures, popular
attitudes, and institutions. Hence, it is perceived as a
process essentially representing the whole gamut of positive
change in social welfare, addressing income distribution, to
help a nation to progress from low living standards to high
standards of living, with better accessible education for
everyone, more jobs, access to basic needs such as food,
shelter, health and protection. Important to note also is,
how sustainable these high standards of living are. This
aspect paints a picture of an economy into the future and
provides an outlook of threats and opportunities for the
economy.
The central economic problems of all
societies include scarcity of resources, which must be
allocated to competing needs. The questions of what, where,
how, how much, and for whom to produce goods and services
confront each country. Hence, allocation should be done on
the basis of the characteristic of the demand, whether or
not it is a need or a want, as well as its impact on the
social well being of the economy. For example, proper
allocation to a particular demand can be assessed on the
basis of whether it reduces all aspects of inequality,
create more employment opportunities, and reduce poverty?
In his key note address in parliament on the
national budget, the Honourable Minister of Finance and
Development Planning stated that foundations for Lesotho’s
sustainable development laid two years ago continue to be
firm, and they are being extended and strengthened. This
article positions this statement in the theory of
development economics, and attempts to identify and analyse
three of its aspects, namely: the country’s progress towards
sustainable development, some economic outlook as well as
challenges that may threaten this progress.
The Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF)
- A new budgeting tool
A new tool, following
the incremental budgeting which proved to be ineffective,
termed
the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) was used in the
preparation of this year’s budget. MTEF
is defined as a transparent planning and budget formulation
process within which the Cabinet and central government
agencies establish contracts for allocating public resources
to their strategic priorities. It ensures overall fiscal
discipline
and facilitates the annual planning and budgeting process.
It
is seen as more efficient tool in the allocation of public
resources to more productive sectors to achieve economic
growth. Moreover, it is seen as a channel that provides the
necessary link between the budget and the Poverty Reduction
Strategy (PRS). This is much different from the way
Government of Lesotho (GoL) has been allocating resources,
implementing the budget and monitoring progress. The overall
budget seeks to ensure that, first, aggregate public
expenditure grows by less than nominal growth in GDP;
second, sustainable budget deficit in the medium term is
maintained; and third, additional external finance on
concessional terms is mobilised.
Figure
1
Progress
The Government has made strides in certain
areas which indicate its resolution to achieve sustainable
development. First, the budget preparation process is
transparent, because it requires that the priorities of the
Cabinet be explained in a Budget Policy Statement, whereas
the priorities of individual ministries are explained in
their Corporate Plans. Second,
as outlined in the 2004/05 budget, the
achievements include upgrading sovereign rating of our
currency by Fitch Rating Agency from B+ to BB-, which was
driven by improvement in policies, external debt management
and sound macroeconomic management. Third, the National
Vision 2020 was adopted in May 2004 as well as the Poverty
Reduction Strategy (PRS), which was approved in December
2004. The fourth is the reported increase in the enrolment
in schools to cover class six of Free Primary Education in
2005. Another important task towards income re-distribution
was the introduction of old age pensions in November 2004.
Furthermore, efforts were also expended towards the ABC
campaign against HIV/AIDS, voluntary counselling and testing
and the creation of an infrastructure for training,
treatment and care of the infected and affected.
In addition, convictions are gaining momentum
for public servants charged with trickster, fraud and
corruption, and the backlog of cases is dealt with
accordingly. Needless to say, the local government elections
have been organised, and local governance is seen as a
positive move towards the attainment of accelerated service
delivery. Also, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food
Security has intensified awareness to commercialise
vegetables production and improvement in livestock rearing
in areas that proved unproductive for crops.
It, nevertheless, goes without stating that
despite these achievements, many challenges still loom on
the horizon.
Challenges
The Honourable Minister acknowledged that
there are challenges that remain ahead. In order to achieve
the commitments contained in the Budget Speech, the
government faces a mammoth task in terms of allocation of
its scarce resources, even the implementation of strategies
that align funds with needs. As indicated in the speech,
private sector development was very important to realise job
creation and poverty reduction. This underscored the need
for expansion of existing industrial clusters and attraction
of new investors. However, a major structural bottle-neck
hindering new investment is that it takes a total of 92
calendar days to complete required procedures for legally
running a business entity in Lesotho, compared to only 38
calendar days in South Africa.
The problems are further compounded by the
fact that GoL has to effectively monitor and evaluate the
use of public funds. The rate at which funds are disbursed
has always been higher than physical development, it being
of recurrent or capital nature. The Ministry of Finance and
Development Planning should, therefore, position itself to
better coordinate and effectively monitor other government
programmes. Grants have been flowing in and out of the
country underutilised or unutilised, while in some
instances, Loans have taken precedence over Grants. Other
challenges hinge on all the tripartite role of
infrastructural development, be it physical, human, or even
institutional, e.g strengthening private sector
organisations. Development of infrastructure is essential
for creation of a supportive trade and investment
environment. Among other things that attract foreign
investors and private sector development is an enabling
environment. Thus government should more importantly:-
-
Improve business, legal and regulatory environment and
streamline registration and licensing as well as access to
property ownership by foreign investors.
-
Improve the quality and delivery of education, as well as
enhance provision of tertiary education in the country.
-
Strengthening of the extension services to farmers and
help them to adopt appropriate proven technology to
improve productivity.
-
Financing of the estimated deficit for this fiscal year
could be through issuing Fiscal Treasury Bills, though
this may crowd out the sluggish private sector. Thus this
poses a challenge for an accelerated move towards
development of domestic capital markets, and hence provide
platform for financial sector development.
-
Encouragement of Basotho to save, and the entrenching of
financial deepening.
-
Gaining of victory in the continued fight against HIV/AIDS
which not only erodes government funds, but also destroys
a young, able-bodied labour force. It thus perpetuates and
permeates the venom of poverty.
There is still some ray of hope for the
Mountain Kingdom and its inhabitants.
Prospects
The first prospect relates to real sector
developments which include, inter alia, the extension of
AGOA I under AGOA III which will run until 2015, the
reopening of the Cannery at Masianokeng, as well as the
renewed mining activity in sandstone and diamonds. Second,
the country was selected by the United States to negotiate a
five-year Millennium Challenge Account Compact to provide
assistance. It is important to mention that
upgrading by Fitch Rating Agency from B+ to BB- has a
potential for attracting investors to this economy.
Again, decentralisation will facilitate monitoring of some
activities through community/local government structures.
For example, the Ugandan experience has shown that some
social services are best monitored by communities.
Therefore, government is in the right direction to implement
MTEF with Local Government in place. Moreover, financial
sector development will also go a long way in facilitating
investment and economic growth, that is, as soon as the
current structural impediments are addressed through the
services of a credit bureau and the entry of First National
Bank and the Lesotho Postal Bank into the market.
Conclusions and recommendations
The 2005/06 budget seems to be the answer to
low absorptive capacity that donor communities have been
complaining about, and redirecting resources to their
productive uses. It is an initiative that exposed the
Government’s commitment to implement her priorities and
ability to streamline policies. However, the attainment of
these targets demands commitment, and efficiency, not only
on the side of Government, but even the private sector, as
well as the non-governmental organisations, and indeed the
ordinary Mosotho in the village. The government should
therefore encourage the manufacturers to fully utilise the
financial services such as forward exchange rate contracts
in order to curb foreign exchange risk which erode their
profits.
This report was benefited by the Budget
Speech for the 2005/2006 fiscal year.
Table 1. Monetary and Financial Indicators*
|
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
12.17 |
12.17 |
12.17 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
11.00 |
11.00 |
11.00 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
1.35 |
1.36 |
1.35 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 –
1.3) |
10.82 |
10.81 |
10.82 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield
(91-day) |
7.90 |
7.86 |
7.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million
Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2)
|
2429.1 |
2373.1 |
2234.7 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by
the Banking System |
-875.33 |
-725.21 |
-1217.28 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets –
Banking System |
4145.04 |
3972.42 |
4222.91 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3523.59 |
3357.53 |
3686.32 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
-263.76 |
-137.13 |
-605.90 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
156.80 |
176.46 |
143.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate
(monthly average) |
6.0536 |
5.7587 |
5.9733 |
|
4. Inflation (year-on-year percentage
change) |
4.7 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
|
5. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
2004
|
|
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|
5.1 Current Account Balance |
-281.2 |
-275.2 |
-77.3 |
|
5.2 Capital and Financial
Account Balance |
319.3 |
155.5 |
224.6 |
|
5.3 Reserves Assets |
-0.8 |
391.7 |
-1.2 |
Table 2.
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product
Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.3 |
3.9 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-1.9 |
-0.4 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.9 |
-0.4 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
7.8 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
|
2.3 Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of GNI
Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
68.2 |
82.8 |
74.5 |
79.2 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-17.4 |
-24.5 |
-21.1 |
-25.8 |
|
3.3 Official Reserves ( Months of
Imports) |
11.7 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent
of GDP) |
-1.0 |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
2.5 |
|