|
Lesotho’s
budget speech for the 2006/07 fiscal year: Results Do Matter
Background
The budget speech is the annual government policy document
that highlights the objectives that Government commits to
achieve. It reviews performance of the preceding budget and
provides the outlook for the current year. It is a device
for ensuring a continuous monitoring procedure, reviewing
and evaluating performance with reference to previously
established standards. Through budgets, Governments allocate
anticipated revenue collection to various government
programmes in line with the agreed priorities and
objectives. The funds are allocated to effect delivery of
social services and development of infrastructure in an
effort to stimulate economic growth and reduce poverty. The
budget can be used as a gauge to determine the fiscal
incidence (incidence of expenditure and taxation).
The Government of Lesotho (GoL) engaged in a number of
reforms in the past recent years. Some of the reforms,
though not directly fiscal, have impacted on the fiscal
performance. For instance, the privatisation programme has
relieved, to some extent, budgetary pressures from some
parastatals that were not realising profits. The other
reform is the public sector improvement reform programme
that is ongoing, which aims at improving efficiency in
delivery of public services.
In his presentation on the national budget in Parliament,
the Honourable Minister of Finance and Development Planning
(MoFDP) reiterated the national objectives for poverty
eradication. The objectives synchronised all operational
policy documents and linkages to other international
treaties that Government has ratified. The Minister
emphasised government commitment to the afore mentioned
objectives, and hence the Budget could not be divorced from
them.
The 2005/06 Budget and its linkage to the current budget
The GoL piloted the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF)
in 2005/06 with three (3) ministries. The current budget
proposes inclusion of additional three ministries, which
brings the total to six (6). The MTEF is an annual, rolling
three year-expenditure plan. It sets out the medium-term
expenditure priorities and budget constraints against which
sector plans can be developed and refined.
MTEF is seen as the cost aspects of the
Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS), which was approved and
adopted by Cabinet in 2004/05. The PRS is consistent with
the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), whose achievement
will place the country closer to realising the Long Term
Vision (Vision 2020).
The following are some of the milestones towards attainment
of the MDGs;
-
Free Primary
Education (FPE) has now entered its final year.
-
The fight
against HIV and AIDS has been strengthened by provision of
anti-retroviral, treatment and support of those infected
and affected by the pandemic.
-
Local
government elections with a balanced gender representation
provides for fundamentals of good governance.
The 2005/06 budget stimulated the process to address the
investment climate. Specific activities included
organisation of the private sector development forum in
April 2005, whose aim was to identify the necessary reforms
and suggest actions. The implementation of those reforms
will continue in the 2006/07 fiscal year, with support of
the donor community.
It is with these initiatives that the country
scored a BB- rating in Long Term Foreign Currency (LTFC) by
Fitch Credit Rating Agency. As in the previous year,
Lesotho’s ability to pay off its short-term foreign currency
loans is rated ‘speculative (B)’. The country was rated on a
better position to honour long-term local currency
commitments than foreign currency obligations at ‘BB+’
rating.
Focus of the 2006/07 Budget and its Implications
a)
Key policy issues
The investment climate and private sector development are
the key areas that this year’s Budget Speech emphasised. The
GoL has undertaken policy reviews to assist the small,
medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs), in particular, to take
an active role in employment creation. A number of policy
reviews and revision of some outdated legislature are either
ongoing, or pipelined for the next fiscal year. Producers,
whose exports are destined beyond the SACU region, have been
accorded a zero per cent company tax on income. The overall
company tax has been revised downwards from 35 per cent to
25 per cent. The preferential rate for manufacturing and
agriculture has also been revised from 15 per cent to 10 per
cent.
These initiatives have some implications on the budgetary
operation. Firstly, they aim to protect the existing
companies in the economy by foregoing income tax, which
forms the significant portion of GoL revenue. Secondly, the
budget relies on the customs revenue, which may not be
sustainable in the long term, due to the free trade
arrangements. This is a challenge to efforts targeted at
improving domestic tax revenue. Furthermore, this may result
in the fiscal balance being financed through domestic
borrowing in the future, and hence crowding out private
investment.
The budget also called for the private-public partnership
approach to infrastructure provision. The health sector has
been earmarked to pilot the initiative, with construction of
the ministerial headquarters, as well as, the referral
hospital. There are, however, some legislative issues and
guidelines that need to be addressed to curb any unforeseen
risks.
b)
Sectoral allocation
Government
is committed to the development of infrastructure, both in
the Urban and Rural areas. Focus of the current budget will
be on development and construction of roads networks,
improvement of domestic and industrial water supply,
electricity and communications. Social services will
continue to get the largest allocation, with emphasis on
improving delivery of health services both at clinics and
hospital levels. This is expected to contribute to the
reduction in poverty levels in the economy.
c)
Budget financing
The proposed budget forecasts an overall surplus equivalent
to 2.8 per cent of GDP. This means Government will not crowd
out private investment, and hence, enable the private sector
to access domestic resources at lower costs.
Challenges
In order to achieve the commitments contained in the Budget
Speech, the Honourable Minister acknowledged that there are
challenges that remain ahead. For private sector
participation in the economy, the following are some of the
reforms planned for implementation during 2006/07:
a.
Addressing financial sector bottlenecks including
improvements in payments and clearing systems, creating an
enabling environment for leasing and mortgage regimes,
establishing a credit bureau, and improving or enacting
related legislation;
b. Strengthening
judicial services related to financial intermediation,
including strengthening, simplifying, streamlining, and
expediting commercial court procedures as well as
establishing small claims courts;
c. Streamlining
land titling and lease application procedures and
computerising lease management and registration processes;
d. Improving
and computerising the immigration and passport services;
e. Strengthening
capacity building programmes for the private sector,
including the establishment of business information centres.
f. Restructuring
the government procurement system and expediting payments to
suppliers by government.
For the identified development priorities to be realised,
Government has to put in place a monitoring and evaluation
system. With the local authorities fully functional,
physical monitoring of projects is expected to be done by
the concerned beneficiaries at the respective community
levels. Financial monitoring is expected to be dealt with at
the local government structures, and audited by the Central
Government.
Prospects
Despite the above mentioned challenges, there is a positive
outlook for the future. The Millennium Challenge Account
(MCA) and the Japanese Government have pledged to support
the review of policies and legislation to improve the
investment climate in the country. The grants will be used
to improve private sector competitiveness as well as
increasing investment, and hence economic growth. These have
a potential to eliminate obstacles to investment, focusing
on reducing the cost of doing business, improving the legal
and regulatory framework and diversifying the economy
through skills development and support to Lesotho’s SMMEs.
MTEF will facilitate alignment of resources with priorities,
hence ease implementation of PRS. GoL has established the
Cabinet Budget Committee, with the mandate to monitor and
ensure adherence to agreed priorities and their relevance to
the national goals and objectives.
Even though some factories closed down following the phasing
out of the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC), the
operations at the Denim Mill have allayed fears that more of
the factories may close. The re-opening of the Masianokeng
Cannery, as well as, the sandstones mining also responds
well to the need to diversify products. The Postbank has
completed the first phase with 11 branches operational
throughout the country. This may improve the sluggish
financial intermediation in the economy. Its effectiveness
will rely on successful implementation of identified pact to
improve the investment climate. The anticipated budget
surplus will also provide the private sector an opportunity
to access domestic financing for investment.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Government has made commendable strides towards realising a
transparent and accountable budget. The Honourable Minister
alluded to directing efforts and resources to specific
priorities identified during the budget year. This will
simplify monitoring, and enhance speedy delivery of tangible
results. The establishment of the Cabinet Budget Committee
is a positive development to ensuring adherence to budget
allocations, while redirecting allocated funds from slow
implementing sectors to active projects. However, active
participation by parliament in budget monitoring is
essential, since the house is responsible to allocate funds
to respective sectors of the economy. The public accounts
committee (PAC) should be given the necessary support to
improve accountability of the ministries, with timely
release of audited accounts.
This report has benefited by the Budget
Speech for the 2006/2007 fiscal year: Results Do Matter.
Table 1:
Monetary and Financial Indicators+
|
|
Nov. |
Dec. |
Jan. |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per
Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
1.24 |
1.24 |
1.24 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 –
1.3) |
10.26 |
10.26 |
10.26 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield
(91-day) |
6.60 |
6.95 |
6.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million
Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2)
|
2593.5 |
2565.8 |
2571.4 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by
the Banking System |
-1103.20 |
-898.29 |
-1399.82 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets –
Banking System |
4580.33 |
4179.63 |
4631.52 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3200.22 |
3076.22 |
3457.3 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
-365.57 |
-71.66 |
-564.26 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
392.09 |
545.31 |
400.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate
(monthly average) |
6.6561 |
6.3691 |
6.0958 |
|
4. Inflation (year-on-year percentage
change) |
3.4 |
3.5 |
|
|
5. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
QII
|
QIII
|
QIV
|
|
5.1 Current Account Balance
(Excl. LHWP) |
-122.41 |
34.71 |
-51.90 |
|
5.2 Capital and Financial
Account Balance (Excl. LHWP) |
187.88 |
-102.54 |
102.73 |
|
5.3 Reserves Assets |
-94.55 |
26.53 |
-86.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2:
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005* |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
1.2 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product
Excluding LHWP |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
1.1 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNI |
1.6 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
0.3 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-0.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
-0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
-8.3 |
|
2.3 Construction |
6.9 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
2.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
3.9 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of
GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
93.9 |
80.1 |
81.3 |
76.0 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-11.6 |
-5.8 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
|
3.3 Capital and Financial Account |
6.4 |
3.8 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
|
3.4 Official Reserves (Months of
Imports) |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent
of GDP) |
-2.8 |
-0.3 |
8.4 |
1.5 |
* Preliminary
estimates
|