|
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRGF IN LESOTHO
The three-year
PRGF programme agreed upon between the government of Lesotho
and IMF was not strong enough to address poverty and related
problems in Lesotho, though it did help the country to
recover marginally from the political disturbances of 1998….
Background
During most of the 1990s, Lesotho enjoyed favourable
macroeconomic environment, The Structural Adjustment
Programme (SAP) implemented early in the decade, investment
driven by Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP), and
improving manufacturing production resulted in an average
real GDP growth of 6% for the decade ended 1997.
Nonetheless, the situation changed towards the end of the
decade. Following such developments, the Government launched
a nine months programme monitored informally by the IMF and
was a success. The Government then entered into a more
formal programme for three years under the PRGF. The purpose
of the paper is to assess the success or otherwise of the
programme, highlight lessons learned and suggest possible
solutions and improvements for the future.
Performance during Oct 2003 to March 2004
Net Domestic Financing (NDF)
The domestic financing criteria recorded a surplus of M32.14
million compared to the program target of a deficit of M272
million at the end of March 2004. In December 2003, the NDF
was also met at M121.5 million compared with the program
target of M269 million. The improved performance was largely
on account of improved revenue collection by the Lesotho
Revenue Authority (LRA).
Net International Reserves (NIR)
The NIR target was also met in December 2003 at $390.4
million and $373.0 million in March 2004. The Central Bank
continued to sterilize the excess liquidity by issuing
treasury bills to maintain an adequate level of reserves.
The impact of capital account liberalisation embarked by the
Bank in June 2003 has not yet been felt.
Structural Benchmarks
During the period, the country did not perform well in
meeting the structural benchmarks. Out of the four
performance criteria only one was met, and that relates to
advertisement of positions of Deputy Accountant Generals.
The other two were partially met with some work still
remaining. The remaining performance criteria that relates
to appointment of the vehicle lease contract representative
is still on-going. The country also met only one of the
non-performance criteria structural benchmarks out of four.
General Performance in the Medium-Term: 2000-2003
Export-Led Economic Growth
Economic growth was considered pivotal for poverty
reduction. A target of 4.0 per cent real GDP growth was set
for the medium-term. This was sufficient to increase real
per capita GDP by at least 1.0 per cent. This would be
achieved though export promotion with an emphasis on
manufacturing. However, the target was not achieved as real
GDP grew at an average rate of 3 per cent for the three
years ended 2003/04.
Prudent Financial Management
The Government determined to limit the fiscal deficits to
levels that will serve to contain aggregate demand, and that
could be financed by external grants and concessional loans.
Quantitative targets of Net Domestic Assets (NDA) and Net
Domestic Financing (NDF) were set and reviewed every six
months. The targets were set to guide the banking system.
The NDF target controlled the size of the deficit and
ensured that it would not be inflationary and impact
negatively on the NIR. In addition, the Government planned
to restrict the wage bill at 13.5 per cent of GDP over the
medium-term through natural attrition and elimination of
ghost workers. This would contain the size of recurrent
expenditure and allow the Government more spending power on
growth-friendly capital projects. Lastly, the Government
aimed to strengthen its finances by undertaking reforms. In
this regard, it planned to create a more autonomous revenue
authority to enhance revenue collection, and replace General
Sales Tax (GST) with a more efficient and fair Value Added
Tax (VAT) system.
The NDF target was partially met as it was missed on two
test dates during the programme period. The March 2002
target was missed mostly on the back of delays in receipts
of foreign funds due to Government. On the other hand, the
failure to meet the June 2003 target was ascribed to
Government’s off-budget expenditure on famine relief,
specifically agricultural support. The NDA target was met on
all test dates set as performance criteria for the
disbursement of PRGF loan amounts.
Strong External Position
Minimum limits on NIR were set to ensure that the external
position of the country remains strong. In addition, the
government resolved to bring the contraction of more non-concessional
debt to a halt. The objective is to maintain official
reserves at levels equivalent of six months of import cover.
A strong external position would attract foreign investment,
maintain the loti/rand peg and facilitate cross border
trade. The Central Bank planned to introduce open market
operations and a competitive securities auction system in an
effort to create a more effective liquidity management
system. The minimum limits on NIR were met during the period
under review.
Price Stability
Given the importance of price stability in poverty reduction
efforts, authorities chose to monitor price developments
during the programme period. Desired inflation levels would
be pursued within the broader policy framework under the
Common Monetary Area (CMA) region. An inflation rate of 5.0
per cent was projected for end of 2002/03. The
projection was based on the outlook of inflation in South
Africa, as Lesotho’s inflation is largely imported due to
the currency peg and close trading relationship between the
two countries. The price stability objective was also
achieved.
Institutional and Capacity Building
Structural benchmarks on various activities aimed at
strengthening the foundation for poverty reduction efforts
were set during the PRGF targets. In addition, other
important targets included:
Establishment of a Credit Bureau, which would boost loan
repayment culture and confidence of commercial banks to lend
to the private sector. This target was is still on-going and
applications for bidding companies are under consideration.
Establishment of Lesotho Telecommunications Authority (LTA),
the telecommunications regulator. The establishment of LTA
was successful.
Privatisation of Lesotho Electricity Corporation. This
target is still on-going as the interim management of LEC
was put in place to restructure the company being put for
privatisation.
Issues For the Future
Table 2.
Monetary and Financial Indicators+
|
|
Dec |
Jan |
Feb |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
12.50 |
12.50 |
12.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
12.00 |
11.5 |
11.5 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
2.00 |
2.41 |
2.31 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 – 1.3) |
2.00 |
10.09 |
10.19 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield (91-day) |
10.57 |
9.21 |
9.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2) |
2297.9 |
2217.9 |
2279.1 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by the Banking System |
-167.0 |
-386.4 |
-371.9 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets – Banking System |
3460.7 |
3699.4 |
3845.7 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
2853.0 |
3188.1 |
3055.92 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
380.6 |
171.6 |
30.1 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
364.9 |
333.6 |
325.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate (monthly average) |
6.500 |
6.963 |
6.6618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
2003
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
|
4.1 Current Account Balance |
-304.8 |
-300.6 |
-299.8 |
|
4.2 Capital and Financial Account Balance |
319.3 |
155.5 |
320.0 |
|
4.3 Reserves Assets |
-0.8 |
391.7 |
-156.6 |
Table 3.
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002* |
2003+ |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
1.3 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
3.3 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product Excluding LHWP |
0.0 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNP |
-3.2 |
0.6 |
2.5 |
2.7 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNP |
-5.0 |
-1.7 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
2.9 |
0.6 |
-4.0 |
-0.4 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
4.4 |
7.9 |
6.9 |
5.0 |
|
2.3 Construction |
9.7 |
1.3 |
6.9 |
4.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
-0.9 |
2.2 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of GNP Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
71.9 |
74.9 |
87.3 |
80.6 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-8.8 |
-2.9 |
-8.6 |
-7.8 |
|
3.3 Official Reserves ( Months of Imports) |
8.9 |
11.7 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent of GNP) |
-4.9 |
-1.0 |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
|
|