|
THE PHASING-OUT OF THE MULTI-FIBRE AGREEMENT
(MFA): ITS IMPLICATION ON THE ECONOMY OF LESOTHO
On December 31, 2004, the Multifiber
Arrangement (MFA), which establishes quotas on different
categories of apparel and textile imports to the US and the EU,
was fully phased out…
Background
The
MFA is a trade agreement adopted in 1973 by the United States,
Canada, and Europe that set quotas for the amount of textiles
and apparel that other countries could export to these
countries. It came into force in 1974, and was seen as a
protectionist measure intended to prevent the loss of textile
and garment industry jobs in the US, Canada, and the EU to other
countries, mainly developing countries, where such goods could
be more cheaply produced. However, by the end of 2004, following
a 10-year phase-out program governed by another agreement, the
Agreement on Textile and Clothing (ATC), that came into force
along with the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreement in 1995,
the MFA system came to an end. This means, beginning 2005, all
WTO members had unrestricted access to the European, US, and
Canadian markets. The expiration has both positive and
detrimental effects on all economies that rely heavily on
textile and garment industries. In small developing economies,
the costs of the abolition far outweigh the benefits. In
addition, in Sub-Saharan Africa, Lesotho remains one of the key
exporters of textile and clothing, and as such the phasing out
of the MFA implies that Lesotho will be strongly hurt, due to
fierce competition from the other cheap exporters. Hence, it is
important to review the reasons for the expiration of the MFA,
the implication on the Lesotho economy and provide appropriate
strategies that could be pursued.
Reasons For Abolition Of The MFA
In January
1995 the WTO put into effect a new agreement that replaced the
MFA called the ATC. This was basically a 10-year plan to
phase-out the MFA system of quotas and integrate textiles and
garments into the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
rules. The ATC, which was preceded by seven years of complex
negotiations, was the transitional tool that facilitates quota
removal. The following reasons were advanced for the abolition
of the MFA: some developing countries felt that the quota system
should be abolished because it prevented them from having
greater access to the lucrative North American and European
markets and thus hindered growth in their countries. Many
countries in
the south sought an end to the MFA as they saw it as operating
primarily in the interests of the industrialised countries’
domestic textile and garment sectors.
However,
severe
competition in the market place, emanating from the abolition of
the quota system will adversely affect smaller economies.
Lesotho’s Textile and Clothing Industry
The Lesotho economy has since
2001 been driven by the manufacturing sub-sector. The textile
and clothing industry remains the key driver of economic
activity in the manufacturing sub-sector, under the auspices of
African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA).
Since then, the economy has been registering positive growth
rates largely due to the remarkably good performance of the
textile and clothing industry. In addition, this sub-sector
remains the largest formal employer in the economy, with an
employment level of 38,195 at the end of March 2005. However,
the level of employment has been deteriorating since 2003,
largely on the back of the strengthening of the rand and hence
loti against the US dollar. The appreciation of the rand
vis-ŕ-vis the US dollar had a negative effect on the
profitability of clothing and textile industry, and hence the
lay-off in number of employees. This was further exacerbated by
the expiration of the MFA, on 31 December 2004. The expiration
meant that, the country would face fierce competition from other
low cost producers such as China, India and Pakistan, which have
been predicted potential beneficiaries under the new
arrangement. Thus, the expiration has a negative impact on the
employment level in the textile and clothing industry in
Lesotho. Furthermore, the abolition implies a decline in overall
exports, and hence foreign exchange earnings.
The Impact On
The Employment Level To Date
Figure 1

Source:
Lesotho National Development Corporation (LNDC)
As earlier mentioned, the
restructuring of the textile and clothing industry that has been
ushered in by the removal of quotas has meant job losses for
many in Lesotho. As depicted by the graph above, the number of
workers in the textile and clothing industry was generally
steady from April 2004 to November 2004. However, following the
phasing out of the MFA in December 2004, the number of workers
employed in the textile and clothing industry dropped steadily
due to closure of four textile firms in the first quarter of
2005. More than 4,570 workers were reported to have lost their
jobs at the end of March 2005. Although it is too early to make
any conclusive remarks, the continued loss of jobs will be most
hard felt by workers in Lesotho, as there are weak or
non-existent social safety nets and few opportunities for
employment in other sectors.
The Impact On The Export Sector To
Date
The phasing out of the MFA also had
detrimental effects on Lesotho’s economic growth. The textile
and clothing exports account for a significant share of overall
exports. In addition, textile exports account for a significant
source of Lesotho’s foreign exchange earnings. Therefore, the
expiration of the MFA will impact adversely Lesotho’s foreign
assets. Since the loti is pegged at par to the South African
rand, foreign exchange earnings are important in underwriting
Lesotho’s fixed exchange rate regime. As shown by the figure
below, textile and clothing exports fell during the first three
months of the MFA expiration. The slump in exports further
implies the widening of the Current Account Balance (CAB). The
multiplier effect of declining exports has some adverse impact
on national income and other economic indicators.
Figure 2

Source:
Lesotho Revenue Authority (LRA)
Strategies
That Could Be Pursued
In response to the phasing-out of
the MFA a number of reports have called for increasing
productivity through skills training and technology upgrades as
ways in which garment and textile industries in countries at
risk of losing orders can meet the challenge of the post-MFA
era. Furthermore, diversification, developing local inputs, and
investing in infrastructure improvements are also often
recommended as ways to face up to the phase-out.
Bilateral trade agreements have also been predicted to be
important factors that could shape the garment and
textile-trading environment. In addition, a common SADC trade
policy could also curb the adverse effects. Another option
Lesotho could explore could be to consider
specialising in goods with higher
value addition, requiring more of capital and technical
know-how. As such, export revenue could be raised not by
increasing quantity exported but instead by raising price
through greater value addition.
Others have also called for the development of regional trading
blocs in other parts of the world as a possible key strategy for
remaining competitive.
Last,
with downward pressure on wages being one of the predicted
impacts of the phase-out of quotas, efforts to push for living
wages needs to be considered.
Conclusion
The phasing out of the MFA
represents a unique set of threats for the Lesotho economy, more
specifically to the textile and clothing industry. Its phasing
out implies that Lesotho faces fierce competition from lower
cost producers and thus is bound to brace itself to face the
chill winds emanating from an increasingly liberal and
competitive market. As such, the traditional exports may be
under threat and Lesotho is bound to review its whole strategy
to ensure its international competitiveness is not undermined.
On the other hand, the benefits accruing under AGOA are expected
to some extent mitigate the adverse effect resulting from the
phasing out of the MFA.
This
paper benefited from
www.cleanclothes.org
LESOTHO:
LATEST ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL INDICATORS
Table 1. Monetary and Financial
Indicators+
|
|
Feb |
Mar |
April
|
|
1. Interest rates
(Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime
Lending rate |
12.17 |
12.17 |
11.83 |
|
1.2 Prime
Lending rate in RSA |
11.00 |
11.00 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings
Deposit Rate |
1.22 |
1.22 |
1.00 |
|
1.4 Interest
rate Margin( 1.1 – 1.3) |
10.95 |
10.95 |
10.83 |
|
1.5 Treasury
Bill Yield (91-day) |
7.94 |
7.72 |
7.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary
Indicators (Million Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money
(M2) |
2381.5 |
2451.8 |
2488.4 |
|
2.2 Net Claims
on Government by the Banking System |
-982.3 |
-958.1 |
-1198.8 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign
Assets – Banking System |
4058.2 |
4266.3 |
4645.0 |
|
2.4 CBL Net
Foreign Assets |
2941.5 |
2960.1 |
3312.6 |
|
2.5 Domestic
Credit |
-365.2 |
-312.4 |
-559.1 |
|
2.6 Reserve
Money |
349.6 |
440.3 |
415.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$
Exchange Rate (monthly average) |
6.017 |
6.037 |
6.152 |
|
4. Inflation
(year-on-year percentage change) |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
|
5. External Sector
(Million Maloti) |
|
|
2004 |
2005 |
|
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q1
|
|
5.1 Current
Account Balance |
-210.0 |
-116.5 |
22.3 |
|
5.2 Capital and
Financial Account Balance |
170.6 |
225.6 |
-39.3 |
|
5.3 Reserves
Assets |
-15.5 |
-1.2 |
-199.8 |
Table 2. Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output Growth(
Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic
Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic
Product Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
|
1.3 Gross National
Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.3 |
3.9 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-1.9 |
-0.4 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth
Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.9 |
-0.4 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
7.8 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
|
2.3 Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector
– Percent of GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of
Goods |
68.2 |
82.8 |
74.5 |
79.2 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-17.4 |
-24.5 |
-21.1 |
-25.8 |
|
3.3 Official
Reserves (Months of Imports) |
11.7 |
6.4 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government
Budget Balance (Percent of GDP) |
-1.0 |
-2.7 |
-2.5 |
2.5 |
* Preliminary
estimates
|