|
LESOTHO
SOVEREIGN RATING FOR 2005
Lesotho’s long
term foreign currency credit rating by Fitch Rating Agency
remains unchanged at BB-..…
Background
Fitch sovereign credit ratings refer to the capacity and
willingness of a sovereign government to service its debt
within the maturity dates and in accordance with the
conditions agreed with the creditors at the time the loans
were contracted. Regarding the currency in which the debt is
denominated, the ratings refer to financial obligations
denominated either in national or foreign currency.
Furthermore, as for the maturity terms involved, the ratings
reflect long-term and short-term obligations. A short-term
rating refers to obligations maturing in less than 12 months
and thus places greater emphasis on the liquidity necessary
to meet financial commitments in a timely manner.
Investors use credit ratings as indications of the
likelihood of getting their money back in accordance with
the terms on which they invested. The ratings are variations
of the scale A, B, C or D. On the scale employed by Fitch,
the top rating is ‘AAA’ and the bottom ‘D’. The lower the
rating, the bigger the probability of default, and vice
versa. Governments rated above ‘BBB’ are known as
‘investment grade’ while those rated below fall into the
‘speculative grade’ category. In determining the payment
capacity and willingness to repay debt, Fitch considers
macroeconomic variables such as the available stock of
foreign currency reserves, balance of payments flows,
economic growth prospects and capacity to generate revenue
and a variety of political factors.
Lesotho
Credit Rating
Lesotho’s Long Term Foreign Currency (LTFC)
rating has been left unchanged at BB-. It received the same
rating as Brazil, Indonesia, Serbia, Turkey, Ukraine and
Vietnam. This rating is on the lower end of the ‘BB’ rating,
thus implying that there is a possibility of credit risk
developing, particularly as the result of adverse economic
change over time. However, this ‘speculative’ credit rating
shows that capacity for continued payment is dependent on a
sustained, favourable business and economic environment. As
in the previous year, Lesotho’s ability to pay off its
short-term foreign currency loans is rated ‘speculative
(B)’. This means that the country has ‘minimal capacity for
timely payment of financial commitments, plus vulnerability
to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic
conditions’. The country was rated on a better position to
honour long-term local currency commitments than foreign
currency obligations at ‘BB+’ rating.
In the rating process, Fitch identified strengths as well as
weaknesses to the rating of Lesotho. Relative political
stability, strong integration with the South African
economy, strong fiscal position and strong international
liquidity were identified as major rating strengths.
However, the external shock to the textile sector, public
expenditure management and social and development challenges
were gauged weaknesses to the rating of Lesotho.
Strengths
Relative Political Stability
Political stability is key to creditworthiness as it implies
that there would be minimal disruptions to economic and
business activity. Lesotho has enjoyed relative political
stability since the 2002 elections, which introduced an
element of proportional representation into the electoral
system, thereby ensuring a broader representation in
parliament. In addition, local elections were conducted for
the first time for 129 local councils this year, with
one-third of the seats reserved for women. However, the
administrative structures are still being put in place.
Integration within the South African Economy
Lesotho is strongly integrated with the South African
economy. First, it benefits from access to South Africa’s
sound transport infrastructure. Second, the South African
Government investment in the Lesotho Highlands Water Project
(LHWP) which provides water to South Africa is not only a
source of revenue for Government but has also resulted in an
upgrade of transport infrastructure in the rural areas.
Third, its membership of a common monetary area (CMA) has
helped in terms of credibility and price stability. Last, it
is also a member of the South African Customs Union (SACU)
from which it obtains strong customs revenue. Therefore, all
these are considered rating strengths.
Strong Fiscal Consolidation and International Liquidity
Lesotho’s rating has also been supported by strong fiscal
position since 2004/05 fiscal year as well as strong
international liquidity. On the one hand, the relatively
strong fiscal stance was attributable to receipt of SACU
revenue windfall, which caused the revenue to rise to 22 per
cent of GDP from 18 per cent in the previous year. In
addition, non-SACU revenue performance also continued to
benefit from the impact of tax administration reforms.
However, Fitch argues that the medium to long-term outlook
is less favourable owing to shrinkage in the SACU revenue
pool.
On the other hand, Lesotho’s external position is
characterised by low debt burden and strong liquidity
position. Lesotho’s net external debt ratios which typically
benefit from high official reserves and commercial banks’
foreign assets have historically been low. Similarly, in
2004, the country became a net external creditor, and this
was largely owing to a substantial increase in commercial
banks’ foreign assets and further increase in official
reserves.
Weaknesses
External Shock to the Textile Industry
Fitch argued that the expiry of the Multi-Fibre Agreement
(MFA) at the end of 2004 had a detrimental effect on
Lesotho’s textile and clothing industry, despite the
continued advantage of duty-free access to the US under
Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). This has been
cited as the major weakness to Lesotho’s rating. The report
further showed that the elimination of the quotas system in
international trade, resulted in the closure of a number of
factories which in turn led to a decline in number of people
employed.
Public Expenditure Management
Fitch indicated that more efforts to further improve public
expenditure management are needed. Although there was
significant expenditure underperformance on account of
partial spending on local government elections which took
place in April 2005, the postponement of the National
Identity card system and a substantial shortfall in capital
expenditure, the medium to long-term outlook is less
favourable. The main problem from the expenditure side is
most likely to stem from growing pressure from social
spending (including the old-age pension scheme implemented
in November 2004), plans to introduce free secondary school
education, the scheme for higher education abroad and the
food relief for the most vulnerable. Therefore, a lot must
be done to enhance public expenditure management, improve
the productivity of public finances and prioritise spending
in line with the poverty reduction strategy.
Development and Social Challenges
The report highlights that social and developmental
challenges pose a significant constraint to Lesotho’s
ratings. The main social issues remain food security caused
by erratic weather conditions, soil degradation and erosion
and HIV/Aids. Due to its limited arable land, Lesotho has
for a long time been a net food importer. According to the
report, relief from the Government and international
agencies is targeted at around 550,000 vulnerable people
including the elderly, HIV/Aids orphans and schoolchildren.
Conclusion
The country has maintained its international credit rating
at the same level as the previous year. The build-up of
official reserves and commercial banks’ foreign assets, an
important rating strength, allowed Lesotho to become a net
external creditor. In addition, strong fiscal position due
to amongst others, strong SACU revenues was also considered
a major rating strength. However, the country is faced with
quite a number of challenges. First, structural reforms to
restore the competitiveness of the economy following the
expiry of the quota system at end-2004 remain the major
medium-term challenge. Therefore, efforts to mitigate the
situation in the textile and clothing industry should
improve the country’s prospects. Second, efforts to further
improve public expenditure management and address social and
development issues should boost Lesotho’s domestic and
international position.
Table 1. Monetary and Financial
Indicators+
|
|
August |
September |
October |
|
1.
Interest rates (Percent Per Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1
Prime Lending rate |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
1.2
Prime Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3
Savings Deposit Rate |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|
1.4
Interest rate Margin( 1.1 – 1.3) |
9.50 |
9.50 |
9.50 |
|
1.5
Treasury Bill Yield (91-day) |
7.02 |
6.89 |
6.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Monetary Indicators (Million Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1
Broad Money (M2) |
2564.99 |
2538.31 |
2519.64 |
|
2.2
Net Claims on Government by the Banking System |
-1027.26 |
-866.98 |
-1209.13 |
|
2.3
Net Foreign Assets – Banking System |
4495.75 |
4293.31 |
4683.29 |
|
2.4
CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3095.29 |
2985.48 |
3436.30 |
|
2.5
Domestic Credit |
-422.96 |
-270.09 |
-573.47 |
|
2.6
Reserve Money |
374.71 |
448.77 |
425.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot
Loti/US$ Exchange Rate (monthly average) |
6.4669 |
6.3609 |
6.5895 |
|
4.
Inflation (year-on-year percentage change) |
2.9 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
|
5.
External Sector (Million Maloti) |
2005 |
|
|
QI
|
QII
|
QIII
|
|
5.1
Current Account Balance |
22.3 |
-163.3 |
14.7 |
|
5.2
Capital and Financial Account Balance |
-15.2 |
247.7 |
-53.3 |
|
5.3
Reserves Assets |
-199.8 |
-94.6 |
26.5 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Table 2.
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output
Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
|
1.2
Gross Domestic Product Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
|
1.3
Gross National Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
|
1.4
Per capita –GNI |
-1.9 |
-0.4 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
0.2 |
|
2.2
Manufacturing |
7.9 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
|
2.3
Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
|
2.4
Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
3.9 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
External Sector – Percent of GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
Imports of Goods |
75.3 |
93.9 |
79.4 |
73.0 |
|
3.2
Current Account |
-2.9 |
-11.6 |
-5.7 |
-0.8 |
|
3.3
Official Reserves (Months of Imports) |
11.7 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Government Budget Balance (Percent of GDP) |
0.3 |
-5.5 |
-1.9 |
7.7 |
* Preliminary
estimates |