|
LESOTHO HOSTS A SMART PARTNERSHIP DIALOGUE: SOME SPILL-OVER
EFFECTS ON THE ECONOMY
The
Smart Partnership Movement (SPM) is an initiative under the
auspices of the Commonwealth Partnership for Technology
Management (CPTM). It is targeted at combining the resources
of the CPTM with those of the private sector to facilitate
optimal exploitation of technology for attainment of
economic development. With its birth in 1995, the initiative
has been operating for ten years. Over the years its
activities included identification of business opportunities
in manufacturing, initiation of private sector opportunities
in infrastructure development, facilitation of
competitiveness through technology and quality management,
and the integration of environmental management and business
opportunities. Pivotal to its activities is the creation of
an international network of experts capable of managing the
exploitation of technology for sustainable economic
development. This gigantic task is achieved through Smart
Partnership Dialogues. The objectives hereof include several
areas, namely to:
·
Foster
the Smart Partnership principles across nations,
nationalities, government, business and social sectors.
·
Share
experiences and lessons in governmental, economic and
socio-political areas, as well as explore the utilisation of
resources that can benefit and enhance the well-being of the
smart partners globally.
·
Provide
of an avenue for Specialised Links, such as, Government and
Politics, Business and Labour, Arts and Culture, Social
Sector, Academia, and Media.
·
Encourage youth to network, share and consult each other on
issues, opportunities, and challenges confronting them, and
facilitate collaboration and integration of the various
regional Hubs and Webs to create an open global citizenship.
The
recent Dialogue appeared to mark a milestone in the
collaborative effort by the GoL and the private sector
towards sustainable economic development. Little wonder,
that the advent of this initiative has caught the attention
of the scholars and policy makers. As such, this article
reviews the activities of the SPM and assesses its possible
attendant impact on the economy of Lesotho.
Benefits
from the SPM
The SPM
has hosted seven international dialogues over the last ten
years. The dialoguing process has created strong ties of
friendship and trust among world participants. In
particular, there are several strides that CPTM through SPM
has made in assisting Lesotho. For instance, it served as a
lead advisor to the Government in the development of the
National Vision 2020. Again, it extended support in carrying
out the mammoth task on national smart partnership
activities including mobilisation of Government, labour and
business. Furthermore, it provided assistance on the
initiation of a Smart Partner’s Hub. Finally, it served as a
joint Secretariat for the preparation of the Smart
Partnership International Dialogue in 2005, which was held
in Maseru. All these efforts were expended with a view to
cement the link between Lesotho and the rest of the
partners, and open opportunities for Basotho to reap
benefits that accrue from the SPM.
The
Content of the Dialogue
The GoL
got the opportunity to host the Dialogue from the 9-11
November 2005 in Maseru. Since the SPM is about networking;
exchange of ideas, imparting knowledge, trading with and
extending support to one another for mutual benefit, the
occasion embraced a polyglot of participants from academia,
politicians, businessmen, farmers, technocrats, artisans,
youth and disabled people. The dialogue deliberations,
therefore, centred on socio-economic, political, cultural,
scientific and technological issues. The discussants
articulated the importance of culture to Basotho, and
highlighted how investment in this activity can enhance
tourism and earn many people a living. The Maseru Global
2005, like other Dialogues preceding it, was intended to
foster the Smart Partnership principles across nations. It
allowed for participants to share and consult each other on
issues, opportunities, and challenges they are facing. The
dialogue afforded politicians, business and labour
representatives an opportunity to interact on an informal
level.
It may
therefore be interesting to examine the prospective effects
of this initiative on the development of the economy.
The
Smart Partnership Movement and Economic Development
In order
to put the discussion in proper perspective, it may be
useful to demonstrate the link between the SPM and economic
growth. The relationship is rooted in the “game theory”.
This theory states that a country seeks to derive full gains
from trade sometimes at the expense of other countries. They
may impose new and higher import barriers in an attempt to
achieve this goal. The practice is referred to as
“beggar-thy-neighbour” policy in the literature on
economics. The policy hurts global welfare in three ways: it
creates international tensions and domestic distortions; it
harms other countries due to negative spill-over effects,
and may reduce international discipline. It is against the
protectionist approaches that proponents of trade theory
argue for liberal trade as a driver of economic growth.
The SPM
in contrast proposes a different approach, one that
emphasises a “win-win” situation. This latter proposition
places great importance on liberal trade, exchange of ideas,
and expansion of markets for products of one country beyond
its borders. This international cooperation enables
countries to identify areas where they have a comparative
advantage, and concentrate resources in exploiting those.
The situation has a potential of promoting domestic sectors
and increasing their contribution to the growth of the
economy. Development of sectors such as tourism and
sandstone mining can impact positively on the livelihoods of
many Basotho. The SPM will have a meaningful contribution to
the economy by enhancing efficiency in production through
the cross pollination of skills and know-how from experts in
other countries. This is facilitated by the dialogues hosted
by different countries, as well as the networking through
the various Links, such as the Business Link, which allows
participants to communicate and engage in networking, with a
view to gaining personal, corporate or social benefit, under
the aegis of the Smart Partnership flag.
Implications
for the Lesotho Economy
The
overarching challenge facing the country is poverty
reduction. Proponents of the growth theory argue that in
order to reduce poverty, an economy must realise high
sustainable economic growth rates. In view of this notion,
the SPM strives to create an international network of
expertise capable of managing the exploitation of technology
for sustainable socio-economic growth. Hence, the SPM
appears to have great potential to stimulate economic
growth. First, the involvement in the network would
facilitate increased national capacity for the creation of
new industries, access to the management and innovation
skills of big companies, and harnessing of research and
technology activities to enhance wealth creation. Second, it
promotes business development because it offers
opportunities for the business community to contribute to
debates on public policy. Third, the smart partners share
ideas through a network of private sectors across the globe
and this has a potential of enhancing investment and joint
venture opportunities. Therefore, through skills transfer
from big companies to small businesses, as well as cross
pollination of ideas between small businesses that operate
in different markets on the globe, the entrepreneurial
capacity of Basotho would be unleashed. Fourth, as
Businesses, especially at the level of Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs), grow, employment would be created for
many poor Basotho. All these advantages bear an impact on
economic growth and poverty reduction which is a major
challenge to GoL.
Beyond
the prospective advantages discussed in the foregoing, there
are still some challenges going forward. The subsequent
section discusses some aspects that are critical in mapping
the way forward.
Conclusions and Recommendations
The
article concludes that the SPM has a great potential to
unlock the growth capacity of the economy of Lesotho.
However, it should be underlined that SPM is not an end in
itself, rather its activities must gradually translate into
welfare improvement at the grass-root level. Needless to
say, the success of the SPM strategy depends critically on
the existence of sound policy framework, and commitment from
both the public and private sectors. It is in this vein,
that a menu of recommendations is put across as follows:
·
People
should be sensitised about what SPM is, and about the roles
that they can play to fully benefit from the initiative.
·
Government should work hard to eliminate bottlenecks
resulting from bureaucracy which may obstruct
entrepreneurial risk-taking spirit in industry and commerce.
·
Entrepreneurs should ensure that all products and market
interfaces are in order. The products should meet market
demands in terms of quality and quantity standards, as well
as good packaging.
·
Government needs to prioritise on tax policy and
infrastructure investment to create an enabling environment
for business to flourish.
·
Basotho
should take full advantage of the free think tank
facilitated by the global dialogues and networking, to
sharpen their skills, and strengthen their innovation
capacity so as to unleash the production capacity of the
country.
·
Research
should be undertaken to fully understand the constraints to
tourism in Lesotho, and find ways on how this sector can be
fully utilised to propel the growth of this economy in view
of its close link to the rank-and-file.
Table 1. Monetary and Financial
Indicators+
|
|
Oct. |
Nov. |
Dec. |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per
Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
1.24 |
1.24 |
1.24 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 –
1.3) |
10.26 |
10.26 |
10.26 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield
(91-day) |
6.74 |
6.60 |
6.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million
Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2)
|
2519.7 |
2593.5 |
2590.0 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by
the Banking System |
-1209.13 |
-1103.20 |
-910.08 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets –
Banking System |
4683.29 |
4580.33 |
4211.18 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3436.3 |
3200.22 |
3076.22 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
-481.56 |
-365.57 |
7.16 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
425.36 |
392.09 |
545.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate
(monthly average) |
6.5895 |
6.6561 |
6.3691 |
|
4. Inflation (year-on-year percentage
change) |
3.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
5. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
QI
|
QII
|
QIII
|
|
5.1 Current Account Balance
(Excl. LHWP) |
52.86 |
-122.41 |
34.71 |
|
5.2 Capital and Financial
Account Balance (Excl. LHWP) |
-69.05 |
187.88 |
-102.54 |
|
5.3 Reserves Assets |
-119.83 |
-94.55 |
26.53 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2.
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product
Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-2.1 |
-0.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
1.2 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
7.9 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
|
2.3 Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of
GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
75.3 |
93.9 |
80.1 |
81.3 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-2.9 |
-11.6 |
-5.8 |
1.0 |
|
3.3 Capital and Financial Account |
1.9 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
1.4 |
|
3.4 Official Reserves (Months of
Imports) |
11.7 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent
of GDP) |
-1.0 |
-2.8 |
-0.3 |
5.4 |
* Preliminary
estimates
|