|
DECLINING MINEWORKERS’ REMITTANCES:
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LESOTHO ECONOMY
Migrant mineworkers’ remittances
continue to depict a downward trend due to falling number of
Basotho migrant mineworkers employed in the South African
(SA) mines amid higher production costs…
Background
Migrant
labour is viewed as an important source of employment and
hence income in many countries. In order to help solve the
problems of unemployment and income generation in the
migrant workers’ home country, labour shortages in one
country can be compensated for by labour surpluses in
another. In Lesotho, a large portion of migrant labour
income is attributable to mineworkers’ remittances. These
remittances have several positive effects on the Lesotho
economy. Firstly, migrant mineworkers bring foreign
exchange, which the country needs for international
transactions. Secondly, these migrants spend their money on
local products.
In Lesotho,
migrant mineworkers’ employment accounts for the largest
share of overall formal employment. It is followed by
manufacturing and then by government employment. It is
therefore important to look at the implications for the
Lesotho economy as a result of declining mineworkers’
remittances amid falling number of Basotho migrant
mineworkers in the SA mines.
Recent trends in
migrant mineworkers
Figure 1
below depicts that migrant labour has always been an
important source of employment for Lesotho. However, the
average number of migrant mineworkers has been declining
over time as a result of recent developments in both
regional and international markets, which ultimately had
spill-over effects onto the SA economy and hence Lesotho
economy. The 1992/93 and the unpublished 1999 migrant
mineworkers’ surveys conducted by the Central Bank of
Lesotho (CBL) depicted that on average, migrant mineworkers
remitted about 71.3 and 68.9 per cent of their total
earnings to Lesotho, respectively. Therefore, the fall in
the average number of migrant mineworkers over the years
ultimately led to the decline in the mineworkers’ remitted
income as depicted in figure 2 overleaf.
Figure
1: Number of migrant mineworkers employed in SA mines (in
thousands)

Figure 2:
Migrant mineworkers’ remittances (In million maloti)

Causes of the decline in numbers employed
Several
factors are deemed to have contributed to this observed
trend in the number of Basotho migrant mineworkers in recent
years. The strong and volatile rand is considered to be the
major factor. The SA mining companies trade in US dollars
and get their earnings in rand terms, hence movements in
exchange rate, either an appreciation or depreciation of the
rand against the US dollar leads to losses or gains in
profitability, respectively. These companies generally incur
their costs in rand terms, hence the volatility of the rand
may hamper mining operation costs in the sense that it leads
to uncertainties in the market.
The
second major factor is the persistent increase in the
international crude oil prices. Generally, oil is used as
one of the input factors in the production processes by many
companies. Uncertainties in Iraq and in the Middle-East led
to uncertainties in the global supply of crude oil. In
addition, increased demand for oil in India and China also
led to supply-side concerns. Last but not least,
unfavourable weather conditions (hurricanes Katrina and
Rita) in the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf Coast of the United
States (US) during the second half of 2005 also led to
disruption in the oil refinery activities and hence lower
production. All the abovementioned factors had an effect on
the price of oil. The production/operation costs of most
firms in SA, including, mining companies, increased amid the
hike in the price of oil. Therefore, in order to keep the
companies profitable, the affected companies had to resort
to some alternatives such as, laying-off workers, so as to
cut down their operation costs.
Thirdly,
mechanisation, switching from labour intensive production
methods to capital intensive methods, is also considered to
be another factor leading to the falling number of
mineworkers. Furthermore, high wages, which attract black SA
citizens in larger numbers than before and SA’s affirmative
action and localisation policy all led to a shift in the
employment composition of mineworkers. That is, the SA mines
are now giving first preference to SA citizens.
Importance
of remittances
The fall
in the number of migrant mineworkers and the resultant
decline in miners’ remittances do not bode well for the
Lesotho economy. Several impact channels are discussed in
this section.
At
household level:
Remittances are normally used for basic subsistence needs
such as food, clothing, housing, education and health care
and they make up a significant portion of the income of many
households.
At national level:
Remittances provide a significant source of foreign
exchange, finance imports and hence contribute positively to
the balance of payments. In addition, remittances are used
as a potential source of savings and investment for capital
formation and development. As a consequence, this could lead
to the improvement in the living standards of recipients.
The level of income inequality in the country could also be
reduced provided that the poorer or less skilled are the
ones migrating to SA mines.
Future
prospects
During
the second half of 2005, the average price of gold increased
substantially, especially towards the end of the fourth
quarter. The price of gold reached a peak of $528 an ounce
on the 12th December 2005. This significant
increase in the dollar price of gold was due to the
depreciation of the dollar against other major currencies,
such as the Euro, which induced higher demand by European
investors as the metal became less expensive. This positive
development, if maintained, bodes well for the SA mining
industry and therefore the Lesotho economy. This could to
some extent mitigate the impact of the increase in
international crude oil prices, which is used as an input
factor in the SA mining sector. A sustained increase in the
price of gold could result in the improvement in
profitability of the SA mining companies and this would to
some extent put a hold on the laying-off of workers.
With the
pipe-line plans for more diamond mines to be established
within Lesotho in the near future, dependence of the country
on SA mining industry could be reduced. Hence retrenched
Basotho migrant mineworkers could be re-employed in those
mines because of their experience and skills acquired from
abroad.
The
manufacturing sub-sector as the second largest employment
sector in the economy, could serve as an alternative
employment sector for the retrenched Basotho migrant
mineworkers. However, this sub-sector is currently faced
with problems such as, among other factors, the phasing out
of the quotas under the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC)
in December 2004, strong rand and cash-flow problems. These
do not bode well for the employment prospects in this
sub-sector and hence the economy as a whole.
The
agricultural sector too could also be viewed as an
alternative for retrenched Basotho migrant mineworkers.
This sub-sector is however, over-shadowed by persistent
drought and lack of crop diversification, which continue to
result in poor harvests.
The
declining number of migrant mineworkers from the SA mines
and hence declining mineworkers’ remittances pose a
challenge for policy-makers in Lesotho in the sense that
concise and well targeted policies have to be formulated to
absorb the retrenched workers, so as to continue pursuing
the poverty reduction goal.
Table 1:
Monetary and Financial Indicators+
|
|
Oct. |
Nov. |
Dec. |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per
Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
11.50 |
11.50 |
11.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
1.24 |
1.24 |
1.24 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 –
1.3) |
10.26 |
10.26 |
10.26 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield
(91-day) |
6.74 |
6.60 |
6.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million
Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2)
|
2519.7 |
2593.5 |
2590.0 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by
the Banking System |
-1209.13 |
-1103.20 |
-910.08 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets –
Banking System |
4683.29 |
4580.33 |
4211.18 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3436.3 |
3200.22 |
3076.22 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
-481.56 |
-365.57 |
7.16 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
425.36 |
392.09 |
545.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate
(monthly average) |
6.5895 |
6.6561 |
6.3691 |
|
4. Inflation (year-on-year percentage
change) |
3.4 |
3.4 |
|
|
5. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
QI
|
QII
|
QIII
|
|
5.1 Current Account Balance
(Excl. LHWP) |
52.86 |
-122.41 |
34.71 |
|
5.2 Capital and Financial
Account Balance (Excl. LHWP) |
-69.05 |
187.88 |
-102.54 |
|
5.3 Reserves Assets |
-119.83 |
-94.55 |
26.53 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2:
Selected Economic Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product
Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-2.1 |
-0.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
1.2 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
7.9 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
|
2.3 Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
0.4 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
3.9 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of
GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
75.3 |
93.9 |
80.1 |
81.3 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-2.9 |
-11.6 |
-5.8 |
1.0 |
|
3.3 Capital and Financial Account |
1.9 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
1.4 |
|
3.4 Official Reserves (Months of
Imports) |
11.7 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent
of GDP) |
-1.0 |
-2.8 |
-0.3 |
5.4 |
* Preliminary
estimates
|