|
PERSISTENT
OIL
PRICE INCREASES: PROSPECTS FOR THE ECONOMY OF LESOTHO
Prices of Petroleum products in Lesotho rose
twice during the month of August 2005 in response to the
persistent oil price increase. This is expected to spill
over on the prices of domestic goods and services, as
transportation costs soar. The increased demand for oil by
China and other Emerging Markets, due to structural changes
such as increases in demand for transport, the remaining
part resulting from electricity shortages in China created
demand/supply imbalances which reflected robust global
activity, an apparent shift which could be transitory. The
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) are likely to suffer most
as they do not have reserves to hedge against the ultimate
crude oil price increase. The rural and urban communities in
Lesotho will be affected. The rural community mostly use
paraffin for cooking and lighting, diesel for agricultural
activities, while the urbanites use all petroleum products.
However, the rural communities will be the hardest hit
because prices of petroleum products are usually highest in
rural areas.
Therefore, persistently rising oil prices
would likely put a brake on the recovery of the global
economy, and have negative spill-over effects on Lesotho’s
economy. The high dependence on fuel renders many economies
such as Lesotho vulnerable to any oil price shock. This
article provides a review of recent developments in the
international oil markets, traces their possible
implications for Lesotho, and suggests a policy
intervention.
Recent Developments in the Oil Markets
The global oil prices reached the record high
of US$70 a barrel in August 2005, compared with the average
of US$29 in August 2002. According to the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), every US $ 5 price increase per barrel
of oil may cause a global economic slowdown estimated at 0.3
per cent. This analysis reflects the influence of oil prices
on global economic performance. The adverse impact of the
oil price increases will be highest in petroleum importing
countries.
The Organisation for Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC) purported that prices of oil emanated
mainly from non-economic developments such as the political
turmoil in Iraq, terrorism, and hurricanes in the Caribbean
Gulf. It has nonetheless been noted that, at the current
level, the international oil price is likely to continue
impacting negatively on the global economy for the remaining
part of 2005.
China’s oil imports grew by 31 per cent in
2003 due to unreliable energy supply after abandoning coal
as their main input in electricity production. The decision
to adopt petroleum as alternative to coal was influenced by
the negative impact coal had on the environment.
However, the oil exporting countries stand to
gain considerably from persistent oil price increases as was
the case in the late 1970’s. They are likely to realise
increased foreign reserves as the prices of oil rise. This
may also result in improvement in their balance of payments
positions.
The effects of the oil
price increases on Lesotho’s Economy
The hike in oil prices may have several
negative effects on the Lesotho economy. First, though
dependent on commodities produced in South Africa, the
country is likely to experience increased imported inflation
directly through importation of petroleum products. South
African inflation was recorded at 4.8 per cent at the end of
August 2005, compared with 3.5 per cent as of June 2005,
against Lesotho’s 2.9 per cent. Though, the index of
petroleum products is negligible in Lesotho, petroleum
products are mainly used in the rural areas where majority
of the poor live. As such the oil prices, coupled with
mineworkers’ retrenchment may exacerbate the poverty
incidence prevailing in the rural areas. The consumers may
experience the impact of higher imported inflation, since
consumer basket consists mainly of imported commodities from
South Africa. Another possibility is the increase in price
which will reduce commodity demand and impact on business
profit margins. Petroleum prices cause increases in other
prices, especially transport, on which people depend. This
may cause trade unions to negotiate higher wage adjustments,
and further fuel inflation.
Second, since Government indirectly
subsidises petroleum products through oil levy this is not
likely to be sustained if the prices keep on rising because
the fund may dry out. In that case, Government may, on one
hand, have to make a virement and compromise other
activities by the percentage increase of oil prices. On the
other hand, if no virement is made, there may be a jump in
the price level to market prices, which may be felt more by
the transport operators. This can even result in some
companies closing down because demand for their products may
fall significantly.
Third, Commuter fares are determined and
regulated by Government and are mostly not responsive to
changes in the oil prices. However, if the latter scenario
is effected, commuter operators may once again be hit hard
by reduction in their profit margins and the ultimate
solution may be to leave the industry. Furthermore, the
reduction in profit margins may lead to some workers being
laid-off and thus aggravate the already high unemployment
rate in the country. Alternatively, prices may be revised
upwards to absorb the rise in oil prices. Consequently, the
impact of the shock may be felt more than if the fares had
been increasing in line with gradual oil price increases
overtime. In addition, the labour force, which comprises
mostly of the urbanites, will be affected because they
depend entirely on commuter transport to and fro their
workplaces.
Last, the agricultural industry seems to be
gaining momentum in terms of mechanisation. As a result, the
sector may be affected mostly since the lowlands residents
depend on mechanised agricultural implements for
productivity. This will exacerbate the situation as the
sector continues to be negatively affected by persistent
drought and it will undermine Government efforts of
supplying subsidised tractors to support the sector in order
to realise food security. And finally, the government
expenditure resulting from increased spending on petroleum
products will rise and worsen budget deficit.
Policy Interventions
Consequently, both the internal and external
imbalances are looming. In an effort to curb the problem,
Government is likely to increase transfers and subsidies
(direct and indirect), and exert pressure on budgetary
operations, which may result in budget deficit. As petroleum
products are procured in foreign currency, the import bill
is likely to increase in response to higher prices. As such,
due to price inelasticity of petroleum products the volume
would remain unchanged. As a result, trade position will be
negatively affected. Therefore, the current account
imbalance will be realised if the prices keep rising. The
possible response will be to revise the petroleum levy to
contain the declines in Government revenue. However, looking
at the already overstretched revenue base, Government is not
likely to alter taxes, but rather reduce expenditure on
other items as a result of their anticipated virement.
In addition, increased Government spending,
while revenues remain constant will broaden the current
account deficit largely by raising the merchandise trade
deficit. The relationship between fiscal policy and the
balance of payment is discussed within the context of regime
of fixed exchange rates. A more expansionary fiscal policy
puts incipient upward pressure on domestic interest rates.
The Monetary policy faces a big challenge to fight the
anticipated inflation. Interest rates movements are expected
to take direction that will not hamper investment climate,
while maintaining price stability.
Table 1. Monetary and Financial
Indicators+
|
|
May |
June |
July |
|
1. Interest rates (Percent Per
Annum) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Prime Lending rate |
11.83 |
11.63 |
11.50 |
|
1.2 Prime Lending rate in RSA |
10.50 |
10.50 |
10.50 |
|
1.3 Savings Deposit Rate |
1.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|
1.4 Interest rate Margin( 1.1 –
1.3) |
10.83 |
9.63 |
9.50 |
|
1.5 Treasury Bill Yield
(91-day) |
7.16 |
6.93 |
7.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Monetary Indicators (Million
Maloti) |
|
|
|
|
2.1 Broad Money (M2)
|
2392.26 |
2320.91 |
2456.06 |
|
2.2 Net Claims on Government by
the Banking System |
-1009.02 |
-817.22 |
-1140.70 |
|
2.3 Net Foreign Assets –
Banking System |
4428.37 |
4151.03 |
4565.89 |
|
2.4 CBL Net Foreign Assets |
3191.39 |
3000.88 |
3343.90 |
|
2.5 Domestic Credit |
-355.5 |
-159.89 |
-562.98 |
|
2.6 Reserve Money |
327.4 |
358.14 |
382.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Spot Loti/US$ Exchange Rate
(monthly average) |
6.356 |
6.6970 |
6.6038 |
|
4. Inflation (year-on-year percentage
change) |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
|
5. External Sector (Million Maloti) |
|
|
2004 |
2005 |
|
|
Q4
|
Q1
|
Q11
|
|
5.1 Current Account Balance |
-116.5 |
22.3 |
22.3 |
|
5.2 Capital and Financial
Account Balance |
225.6 |
-39.3 |
-39.3 |
|
5.3 Reserves Assets |
-1.2 |
-199.8 |
-199.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Selected Economic
Indicators
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004* |
|
1. Output Growth( Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 Gross Domestic Product – GDP |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
|
1.2 Gross Domestic Product
Excluding LHWP |
3.5 |
2.9 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
|
1.3 Gross National Product – GNI |
0.2 |
1.6 |
6.3 |
3.6 |
|
1.4 Per capita –GNI |
-2.1 |
-0.2 |
4.0 |
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Sectoral Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture |
0.5 |
-4.2 |
-1.8 |
0.5 |
|
2.2 Manufacturing |
7.9 |
6.9 |
5.2 |
5.0 |
|
2.3 Construction |
1.4 |
6.9 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
|
2.4 Services |
2.2 |
2.2 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. External Sector – Percent of
GNI Excluding LHWP |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 Imports of Goods |
75.3 |
93.9 |
79.4 |
73.0 |
|
3.2 Current Account |
-2.9 |
-11.6 |
-5.7 |
-0.8 |
|
3.3 Official Reserves (Months of
Imports) |
11.7 |
6.2 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Government Budget Balance (Percent
of GDP) |
0.3 |
-5.5 |
-1.9 |
7.7 |
* Preliminary
estimates
|